Today, I want to provide you a few lists, a bit of perspective and, perhaps, the possibility of change.
The reason? Seventeen years ago one man turned a gun on himself but not before killing 14 women and injuring 13 others at the École Polytechnique de Montréal.
While countless stories will provide his name, background, socio-economic and cultural status as well as intimate details of his suicide note and warped rational for his killing spree, I will refrain from doing this. Instead, I offer you the names of the dead. The direct victims of one man's violent, patriarchial attitudes towards women; one man's example of the desire for dominance and control over the "other half"; one example of the pervasive and prevalent attitude that women are secondary to men -- an attitude that continues to exist around the world.
People Killed
Geneviève Bergeron (b. 1968), civil engineering student.
Hélène Colgan (b. 1966), mechanical engineering student.
Nathalie Croteau (b. 1966), mechanical engineering student.
Barbara Daigneault (b. 1967) mechanical engineering student.
Anne-Marie Edward (b. 1968), chemical engineering student.
Maud Haviernick (b. 1960), materials engineering student.
Maryse Laganière (b. 1964), budget clerk in the École Polytechnique's finance department.
Maryse Leclair (b. 1966), materials engineering student.
Anne-Marie Lemay (b. 1967), mechanical engineering student.
Sonia Pelletier (b. 1961), mechanical engineering student.
Michèle Richard (b. 1968), materials engineering student.
Annie St-Arneault (b. 1966), mechanical engineering student.
Annie Turcotte (b. 1969), materials engineering student.
Barbara Klucznik-Widajewicz (b. 1958), nursing student.
Now, take a moment. Read the list again. And sit with it. Sit with the knowledge that these women were innocent victims of one man's rage. Sit and reflect on the fact that they were punished, not for what they did, but for who they were. Now reflect on the fact that most of us, at least once in our life, will experience this unjustified and unwarranted hate directed at us - to some degree and on some level.
Done?
Good. Now remember how YOU felt when persecuted for being who you were. Recall the anger, the fear, the anguish and the confusion.
Got it?
Then take this into your day. Regardless of who you come across remember that prejudice, of any type, can and does kill. There is no rationalization that can justify hate and violence -- whether it is towards women, the LGBTQ community, Muslims, Christians, Jews, the list goes on. Yet, the only way we can truly break the cycle of us vs. them (differientation that leads to prejudice and hate) is to break down our own barriers and walls. Have courage. Persist. We will get through this.
Of course, for those more practically inclined, there are other actions that can and should be done. One such action is to support the Dec. 10th Campaign.
This campaign calls on all people (and organizations/corporations/institutions) to support the status of women in Canada -- a status, they report, which is seriously threatened. For more information of the Dec. 10th Campaign desires and rationale please scroll below to the declaration.
Finally, please examine the following list. It is the tally of all the women that died this year due to men on women violence in the GTA. The names are varied. The consequences are different. The reason is the same.
Women and Their Children Killed in the GTA in 2006
Yasmin Ashareh, 20
Seema Badhan, 19
Rose Boroja, 54
Colleen Bradley, 59
Kamlesh Dhingra, 58
Audrey Gates, 80
Wendy LaFleche, 41
Victoria LaFleche, 7
Jesse LaFleche, 3
Shao-Sang Liang, 38
Vivian Yuen-Yee Chau, 3
Ian Chau, five months
Dale Cheryl Mapstone, 29
Malena Morales, 31
Meherun Nessa, 35
Natalie Novak, 20
Rosa Peterman, 57
Gwendolyn Pilgrim, 35
Thayalini Subramaniam, 31
Malini Thayakumar, 36
Neruuya Thayakumar, 14
Gnanalakshmi Raman, 29
For more information on the Dec. 10th Campaign go to:
http://www.criaw-icref.ca/index_e.htm
For more information on the Dec. 6th Fund go to:
http://www.dec6fund.ca/what.htm
For more information on supporting the movement to end violence against women go to:
http://www.whiteribbon.ca/
Statement for the December 10th Campaign
For Women’s Equality and Human Rights
On December 10th, International Human Rights Day, Canada will mark the 25th anniversary of its ratification of the UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Instead of celebrating this historical milestone, women in Canada are mobilizing to ensure that governments honour and respect their international and domestic human rights commitments. This is because over several months now, the federal government has acted in ways that deny most women’s realities, undermine women’s access to justice, and abandon its own obligation to advance women’s human rights in Canada.
Reality Denied
In 2006, the federal government made a number of important changes affecting women’s equality rights. These include a 40% cut to Status of Women Canada and the elimination of twelve regional Status of Women Canada offices. These measures signal a profound rejection of the realities of women’s lives. The justifications for these measures by Minister Beverley Oda are that women are strong, already equal, and don’t need these critical policy and legal supports. Although we acknowledge that women in Canada have won formal equality rights, we know that much more work must be done to make these equality rights a reality for all women in Canada. One indicator of this is women’s wages. On average, women still earn 71 cents on the male dollar, making Canada 38th in the world in terms of the wage gap ratio. Racialized and Aboriginal women earn significantly less. Their average annual income, respectively, is $16, 621 and $ 13,300. Further, even though 70% of mothers are in the paid work force, Canada still does not have in place a national child care program. According to the Toronto Community Foundation, over 10,000 children are on a waiting list for subsidized child care spaces in Toronto alone.
Access Denied
Access to justice is now denied to women on many fronts. In the last year, the federal government abolished the funding for the national child care program, decided not to adopt an improved federal pay equity law, eliminated all funds for the Court Challenges Program, removed the goal of equality from the mandate of the Women’s Program at Status of Women Canada, and prohibited the use of federal funds to engage in advocacy at any level of government, lobbying and most research. Other policy decisions have also contributed to denying women’s access to equality and their rights. Among these are the cuts to literacy programs, the lack of support for women and men who are homeless, the refusal to respect the Kyoto Protocol, the decisions to renege on the Kelowna Accord as well as Canada’s obstruction of the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Equality Denied
Instead of promoting women’s equality, the federal government is severely hindering: women’s capacity to organize, advocate and lobby. They won’t support women’s equality in the workplace and have limited women’s rights to challenge discrimination before the courts. Canada’s democratic safeguards are indeed being eroded and our internationally acclaimed human rights legacy is seriously in jeopardy.
Respect Your Commitment, Prime Minister Stephen Harper
We, the undersigned, urge Prime Minister Harper to respect his own election commitment to uphold women’s equality and human rights in Canada. During the 2006 election campaign, Mr. Harper stated:
“If elected, I will take concrete and immediate measures, as recommended by the United Nations, to ensure that Canada fully upholds its commitments to women in Canada." (January 18, 2006).
Prime Minister Harper is not respecting this commitment. The government’s approach jeopardizes the historic efforts by Canada to achieve women’s full equality, and disregards women’s human rights here at home. Rather than uphold his commitment to the women in Canada, the Prime Minister has in fact ignored the experience of millions of women in order to justify his government’s actions.
On December 10, we call on the federal Government to:
• Reverse its policy decisions on childcare, pay equity, the Court Challenges Program, Status of Women Canada, and the Women’s program..
• Respect the CEDAW Committee recommendations, by improving the living conditions and respecting the human rights of Aboriginal women, effectively addressing violence against women and women’s poverty, improving maternity and parental benefits, funding civil legal aid, changing immigration laws to respect the rights of live-in caregivers and ensuring a more equitable participation of women in the political institutions.
Women in Canada, because we are strong, determined and passionate, can and will not accept an erosion of their hard won and still fragile equality rights. Women are not living in poverty, as mothers, care-givers or elders, because they are weak or lack self-confidence. They do not choose to become the victims of violence at the hands of partners, family members or strangers. They do not wish to have their children taken from them because of a lack of access to safe and affordable housing. They have not chosen to be under-represented in Canada’s political life, or to be underpaid in countless workplaces across the country. Women, women’s organizations and our allies have chosen, however, to come together to call upon this government to reverse course and promote a collective respect for women’s equality and human rights.
Sincerely,
Aboriginal Women’s Community-Based Studies Initiative
Alliance des femmes de la francophonie canadienne
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Canadian Council of Muslim Women
Canadian Federation of Students
Canadian Federation of University Women
Canadian Feminist Alliance for International Action
Canadian Labour Congress
Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women
Canadian Union of Public Employees
Canadian Women's Community Economic Development Council
Canadian Women’s Foundation
Child Care Advocacy Association of Canada
DAWN Ontario
Fédération des femmes du Québec
Feminists for Just and Equitable Public Policy
MATCH International
National Association of Women and the Law
National Council of Women of Canada
New Brunswick Advisory Council on the Status of Women
Ontario Association of Interval and Transition Houses
Provincial Advisory Council on the Status of Women, Newfoundland and Labrador
Public Service Alliance of Canada
Regroupement provincial des maisons d'hébergement et de transition pour femmes victimes de violence conjugale
Transition House Association of Nova Scotia
Women’s Inter-Church Council of Canada
Women’s Space
YWCA Canada
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
Women is the N&*$er of the world -- Part 2
Labels:
Dec. 10,
Dec. 6,
equality rights,
Montreal Massacre,
prejudice,
Women
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Same note I posted on a previous post of yours:
I believe your use of the word "nigger" in your title is inappropriate for the situation, there is a substantial difference between targeting a race of people and targeting a gender, not that one is any worse than the other, or that one should be tolerated any more or less than the other, but there is a difference. Much of the difference stems from the history that is attached to the word that cannot be translated to the case of a gender of people, because it is not the same, you don't see the same level of hatred, complete disregard for humanity, and even the extent to which many whites of the past did not even consider people of color to be human beings, not even worthy of fair treatment and respect...at least there is a substantial amount of women who are at least looked upon as human, they may not be on the same level (in all interpretations) as men, but there is a big difference between the struggle women have faced and continue to face today, and the struggle faced by those who had to fight against slavery and inequality on a plethora of levels in societies around the globe. I understand your usage of the phrase, but it strikes me as misinformed.
Best.
Dear Anonymous:
First: Thank you. Your comments are important and provide the impetus for discussion on whether or not groups of persecuted people can actually find and use similarities to create systemic changes.
As such, I have a couple of points to make in my use of such an abhorrent word as N*%$er.
First: The title I use is culturally based. When John Lennon constructed his song (aptly titled Woman is the N*%$er of the World) he was attempting to draw attention to the systemic and pervasive attitudes towards woman.
As a child of the 60s, Lennon knew the struggles African-Americans faced in trying to change the racist attitudes of their fellow citizens. Lennon -- a progressive idealist -- realized that while women were not as overtly hated they were victims of systemic prejudice. That was his correlation between the trials and tribulations African-Americans and women faced -- if I may be so bold as to profess to be able to clarify his intentions.
So, my use of this word (and this headline) is a cultural reference to what Lennon recognized as the long, cultural battle to redefine and reorganize the ways and methods the inferior have been treated in our society.
Second: My use of the word highlights an often contested notion that different minority groups can (and should) draw strength from one another in their fight for equality and recognition. In fact that word (recognition) almost demands that differing groups resist identification -- for to be different demands recognition.
But the simple fact is that both blacks and women HAVE and DO experience systemic and pervasive discrimination.
Anonymous, your statement alludes to the fact that the prejudice experienced by women is, by no means, as volatile and as dangerous as that experienced by blacks. May I than reiterate that woman continue to be a VISIBLE entity that is persecuted solely because of their difference. May I also remind you that the violence experienced by women IS based on superiority - man over woman/white over black. May I also reiterate that this attitude (that woman are inferior or chattel) is prevalent THROUGHOUT the world -- not just in pockets, such as southern America or sub-sahara Africa.
So, there is a real and distinct similarity between the horrors experienced by blacks and the horrors experienced by women. Just as there is a similarity between these two subsets of people and the LGBTQ community, or Muslims, or (insert group here)...I think you get my point.
To differientiate the hatred perpetuated on one societal subset because the type of violence was "different" is to buy into the notion that groups CAN and SHOULD be recognized solely on their difference. And this plays into the intolerant attitudes of the very people who perpetuate these crimes (and keep them at a systemic level).
No, my reference is applicable; just as Lennon's reference was applicable. It's an attempt to highlight the horrors OF systemic hatred and to show that it is our very similarity (our humanity) that demands that ALL be treated with respect and equality.
Just my two cents.
throughout the world.
There is and was a difference between the racial hatred held towards blacks in the United States and in portions of Africa and the prejudice towards women.
PS: anonymous, I was unaware that you previously posted. My apologies for not responding then.
Post a Comment